We value your privacy

We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as cookies and process personal data, such as unique identifiers and standard information sent by a device for personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, and audience insights, as well as to develop and improve products.

With your permission we and our partners may use precise geolocation. You may click to consent to our and our partners’ processing as described above. Please note that some processing of your personal data may not require your consent, but you have a right to object to such processing.

More Options

Thu 27 Sep 2012 | 08:15
A quick guide to the new Premiership law changes

13
Comments

The season up north is well under way but some are still unclear on the new law changes being implemented in the Premiership (and elsewhere). Here is a quick video that explains the 4 main changes, which aim to speed up the game and improve player safety.

They are: Concussion Management, extended powers of the TMO, the Scrum Engagement, and the exciting new Ruck law, where teams have 5 seconds to use the ball once it's available.

Premiership Rugby's Rugby Director Phil Winstanley talks us through it, with comments from Harlequins' Director of Rugby Conor O'Shea, and a few of the team captains share their thoughts.

- What are your thoughts on the changes so far? Let us know below

Posted By: Grant Constable

13 Comments

  • 2:01 PM 28/09/2012

    Like the concussion rule, long overdue. Though the nfl has one upped them, an independent doctor assesses the player and decides if they continue or not.

    Like the ruck rule, though refs could have a bigger influence if they just started calling offensive players for off their feet at the ruck.

    Don't mind the tmo rule changing as long as there has not been a breakdown in between the try and infringement.

  • thebfg
    1:08 PM 28/09/2012

    Alex: Really? i don't think it's for the ref to call "turnover", if there's a counter ruck the "clock doesn't re-set, it's still got 5 secs to be used by the side in the opinion of the ref had it to use, if they don't then it's a scrum to the other side, however if the counter ruck produces another situation where it's available but not being used, as a ref i'd call use it again, but in the 8 matches i've reffed this season we've had one situation where we had a scrum to the other side for "not using it"

  • smiffy_ref
    8:04 AM 28/09/2012

    As a referee myself the new 5 seconds at rucks law states that when the ruck is formed the referee calls 'ruck' as normal, then when the ball is available at the base the referee calls 'use it' and from that call the attacking team has 5 seconds to do so.
    If defending team counter ruck during the 5 seconds, referee should call turnover and then when ball is available again for either team call 'use it' and start a new 5 second count.
    Sanction if play is delayed when ball is available is a scrum to opposing team

  • pretzel
    10:38 PM 27/09/2012

    White cards were nothing but a cop out "get out of jail free" card for referees....

    It gives them the easy option of not having to be the target of any flack which may arise from a correct decision which pisses off players and fans alike, or an incorrect decision which is what humans can make from time to time... so instead they "didn't see it" put it on a white card and effectively "shovel shit" onto the next persons desk...

    And in reality what was the white card for anyway? Are we really saying the stuff that was put on a white card was not going to be noticed by the citing commissioner ANYWAY?!?!?? The guy probably has access to every angle under the sun, if he thinks something happened he'll look into it, I doubt a referee standing there with a white card is going to make much of a difference... or is this a budget cut move? "We can't have the citing commissioner sitting there watching the whole match, I know, give the referee a white card and the CC can just look at white card incidents"???

  • pretzel
    9:54 PM 27/09/2012

    Ok, so my 2 cents:

    Concussion rule... I find it absolutely ridiculous that this is not implemented immediately in all rugby competitions... I fail to see the need to "test it". Just throw it right in there. I hate seeing players have nasty head knocks, then get up wobble back down and eventually start playing again... If you have a big blow to the head you should be taken off straight away. Hopefully this might reduce the amount of players who either feel like they have to play in order to keep their position for the next game, or have to play through blind focus of the game.

    TMO... Not too sure on this one, stills seems very limiting and really just a bit petty as it sounds like they have patched a "technicality".. "TMO can now rule on foul play in the open field....during the act of scoring a try".. so the TMO can now "legally" comment on the blindly obvious infringements...

    Scrum... Not so sure about this, I used to play before they brought in the "touch" (I think), or before they brought in something like that, I mean around year 2000. Wasn't it originally, "Crouch Engage" or something like that?!? I can't really remember.. I've tried searching for the evolution of the scrum, but if anyone can fill me in on the calls and how they have progressed, I would appreciated it... Anyway, my point... just seems like ANOTHER thing to figure out in the scrums and seems like we are going BACK to what it used to be, sort of anyway.. So does the "SET" mean engage? :/ Joy for the non native speakers who have just figured out "engage"...

    5 second rule... good in one sense, would like to see the way it's implemented though, do players find its just a little too short? I'm all in favour for stopping the time stalling plays where a team that is just winning just holds onto the ball and creates a wall of bodies and runs the clock down, but I don't want to see the game turn into a mad scramble disorganised free for all because they can't get a decent platform to run off.

  • stroudos
    8:04 PM 27/09/2012

    Hallelujah for the new ruck law!! It was utterly maddening watching England scrumhalves poncing around at the back of the ruck for interminable amounts of time. Although it always seemed a completely self-defeating tactic to me; all it did was allow defences to regroup and have a breather before the next pointless pod drive. Either way I'm absolutely delighted that I won't have to sit through that total bollocks again.

    Everyone who's commented on the TMO so far seems unanimously against it, but as long as it's applied sensibly I'm fine with it. Definitely a better option than the useless white card.

    The TMO opposition reminds me a bit of the Luddite football pundits and fans who still resist goal-line video technology - a position which surely to any rugby fan just seems totally ridiculous.

  • flanker2712
    6:12 PM 27/09/2012

    Thank you IrishRef - very helpful clarification, both on the moment the 5 seconds start counting and the consequence of not playing the ball.

    Pardon the ignorance, but I am sure I have for quite a number of years occasionally heard the ref shout "Use it" (often a number of times in the same sequence of play). In what other circumstances does the ref have power to dictate how quickly a player must use the ball? Does the 5 second rule also apply or is that a new one for the ruck?

    Cheers

  • joshmacy
    2:52 PM 27/09/2012

    Laws are being applied at my level of coaching (USA Collegiate) and there are some positive changes. Scrums are moving along quicker is the most noticeable. Forwards are getting up to the line and readying much faster. With the ruck law, it doesn't seem to really come into play until your playing sloooooow ball near the goal line. Anything that helps manage head injuries is a good thing. All in all not bad.

  • thebfg
    12:14 PM 27/09/2012

    Agree with IrishRef, this is a massive cocok up on the part of the Premiership who should never have let this out!
    We refs have enough problems on a Saturday with players saying "i saw it on TV".

  • irishref
    11:36 AM 27/09/2012

    sorry but he got it wrong in his analysis of the ruck change.

    If the referee feels that the ball is playable at the back of a ruck but the team is not endeavouring to play the ball, he will shout 'USE IT'. From that moment on, you have 5 seconds to play the ball out of the ruck, otherwise scrum to your opponent.

    It is NOT five seconds from when the ref may call a ruck.

    That's a big, fat, glaring error for the director of premiership rugby to make and I'm surprised it hasn't been redacted yet.

  • moddeur
    11:17 AM 27/09/2012

    These new laws have been implemented in France too (apart from the TMO one, the Top14 having its very own TMO innovation). So I gather that they will be in Sanzar next season ; this delay certainly has something to do with calendar differences between North and South.
    The 5 secs in rucks often leads forwards and scrum-halves to start panicking.

  • jjlm
    11:00 AM 27/09/2012

    The new ruck law is great! Quick play, no stalling. The TMO law is okay but i'd like to see a law where each team has maybe one or two TMO requests per game. The scrum law probably won't change that much concerning collapsing scrums, the hit is only a small part of the problem and reducing it is certainly not the solution.

  • eggman
    10:42 AM 27/09/2012

    I like the new ruck law.. Should be interesting to see how it works out. I must say I'm a bit surprised that the Premiership introduced such a law before SANZAR did.. Good on em though.

    Scrum's a good idea too I think.. I heard lots of people (especially in Australia) complain about the Pause, that it kind of throws the players off a bit and makes the timing more difficult and is generally useless. Should be interesting to see whether it has a positive effect on scrums or not.

    Not too happy about the TMO though.. I understand why they'd do it, but I do have some concerns about how fluid the game will be.. And i don't really want rugby to turn into a game where the ref refers everything to the TMO..

Related Articles