Sat 6 Apr 2013 | 08:26
Ma'a Nonu puts the shoulder into former team mate Piri Weepu

24
Comments

It was a miserable Friday night in Auckland for the Otago Highlanders as they lost yet another match, going down 29-18 to the Blues. Ma'a Nonu had a forgettable night, starting with this shoulder shot on former Hurricanes team mate Piri Weepu.

Despite seemingly haiving all the ingredients for success, the Highlanders are having a horrible time so far in this year's Super Rugby competition. They sit bottom of the log after eight rounds, and the game against the Blues was another frustrating one for them.

Ma'a Nonu was sinbinned for a reckless tackle on All Black and former Blues and Hurricanes team mate Weepu midway through the first half. Referee Steve Walsh, who made use of the TMO on regular occasion throughout the match, originally chose to only penalise Nonu for the offence.

Ali Williams took exception to that, and could be heard saying to Walsh that "If it's a deliberate and illegal charge, then it's a card surely?"

"You can't guy nice on Ma'a because you and him have got beef," he added. Walsh seemed to listen, and after having watched the big screen replay and given it some further thought, changed his mind, and showed Nonu the yellow card after all.

The Highlanders conceded two tries during the time that Nonu was off, cancelling out their early 10-0 lead. Weepu suffered no ill-affect from the hit, other than being winded, and went on to score two important tries in the second half.

There were no hard feelings between the two All Blacks though as they were seen chatting and laughing on the field after the game, and big hitter Nonu later tweeted a photo of the two hanging out in the changeroom, saying Weepu was the better man on the night.

They have been mates for ages, as is evident in this hilarious clip of Nonu falling off his chair.

In other news from the same game, George Moala has been banned for a week for the tackle he made on Buxton Popoali'i. The Highlanders wing was knocked out cold from the hit.

24 Comments

  • asdfero
    3:45 AM 11/04/2013

    If you think that the amount of force in a scrum engage is the same as being hit by a 100kg dude going at 10-14 mph, I would say you're horribly wrong; and I play front row.

  • matt
    2:58 PM 08/04/2013

    I love the charge, I disagree with your love of hurting people, and I miss it now that it's gone from league. However, the ARL did an enormous amount of work looking into the risks and rewards of it being legal, and concluded that it is just too dangerous to justify.

  • matt
    2:56 PM 08/04/2013

    Having the guts to change is commendable, but it still baffles me how he arrived at the conclusion that that was just a penalty in the first place.
    There is a lot to be said for someone who is willing to sort out their mistakes, but that doesn't change the fact that they made them in the first place.

  • matt
    2:54 PM 08/04/2013

    I think he's one of the strongest, least influenceable (pretty sure that isnt a word, but you get it) refs around, and it seems to me he will back himself 100% all day, which is admirable and IMO a good thing. But he isn't always right.

  • matt
    2:50 PM 08/04/2013

    I agree with Stroudos and DrG
    But, I was furious watching this live, and am constantly when referees identify the offence correctly, and then don't follow through on the punishments outlined in the rules. There is no doubt that a shoulder charge is at least a yellow, so how can you possibly identify it as a charge and then say it'll only be a penalty?
    Having said that, I admire Walsh's confidence having seen it on the screen to then change the decision, too many referees would've muttured 'ooops' and continued as it was.

  • 4:36 AM 08/04/2013

    Meh .. that had about as much impact as two front rows engaging at scrum time

  • besthookerintown
    3:16 PM 07/04/2013

    Difference between Gailec Football, Hurling and Rugby is that you don't have 18 stone cannonballs throwing themselves around. (Although if you play Junior B like myself this statement can be wrong).

    Also due to the speed, skill, space and nature of GF and H you don't get the same chances for clear shoulder on shoulder chances like you might get on a rugby field.

    Plus as another person on this post said, rugby is a skilled based game, so why can't the tackle be a skill to perfect instead of a tool to try injure opposition players.

  • rufio
    1:49 PM 07/04/2013

    you have NEVER obviously experienced a should charge before have you, you fucking keyboard warrior!! There is a word to describe people like you, and it aint pleasant!!

  • rufio
    1:47 PM 07/04/2013

    walsh is a good ref, infact, one of the best, but hes had a few shockers recently!!

  • yannoche
    1:02 PM 07/04/2013

    Same here, Walsh is my fav ref !

  • asdfero
    8:30 AM 07/04/2013

    I applaud you quietly from my laptop, sir.

  • stubby
    2:00 AM 07/04/2013

    he said that he saw it on the screen and because there is the TMO protocol now that he decided to make it a yellow card. Without the TMO protocol he would have been stuck with the original decision.

  • stroudos
    1:27 AM 07/04/2013

    Agree with the sentiment, but thankfully there's still a massive difference between the captain making a point reasonably politely to the ref and the sort of shenanigans we see in football.

  • themull
    12:28 AM 07/04/2013

    Gaelic football, aussie rules, hurling, ice hockey, american football, soccer in old days...not entirely sure it should be legalized given how it may become dangerous if it was a blindside hit..

    Even so, it's not nearly as dangerous as some are making it out to be..It will hurt the player for sure, but rugby is about hurting a guy in the tackle, not seriously obviously but winding a guy or giving him a few sore ribs etc...In terms of serious injury, so long as it is shoulder to shoulder (side on) then there really isn't much more danger involved than a guy getting absolutely creamed after catching an up and under...

  • themull
    12:28 AM 07/04/2013

    Gaelic football, aussie rules, hurling, ice hockey, american football, soccer in old days...not entirely sure it should be legalized given how it may become dangerous if it was a blindside hit..

    Even so, it's not nearly as dangerous as some are making it out to be..It will hurt the player for sure, but rugby is about hurting a guy in the tackle, not seriously obviously but winding a guy or giving him a few sore ribs etc...In terms of serious injury, so long as it is shoulder to shoulder (side on) then there really isn't much more danger involved than a guy getting absolutely creamed after catching an up and under...

  • drg
    12:13 AM 07/04/2013

    Meh, I quite like Walsh, he comes across as one of the "oldies" who enjoys a game with a bit of fair biff.. lol..

    But of course we disagree, so each to their own.

  • drg
    12:11 AM 07/04/2013

    Sorry, I was about to reply but I got distracted and just left that comment. But yes I agree with you, I also hope that it wasn't "a captain in his ear" that caused his change of heart. Last thing we need is a football nature of pushing and pulling the referee so he listens to you.

  • upthelowend
    10:29 PM 06/04/2013

    Whilst he managed to make the right call in the end... eventually, I think Walsh is a disgrace and isn't fit to ref schoolboys.

  • jimothy
    10:26 PM 06/04/2013

    They've even banned it in League so it must be bad!!!! Rugby is a game of skill and tackling should be skillful. This clip showed that these tackles don't take a great deal of it and just brute strength!!!

  • skronydn
    10:13 PM 06/04/2013

    Nonu is a douche and in my opinion should not be an All Black any more. Walsh changed his decision after seeing the big screen and l think(l could be wrong) in consultation with the TMO. Hore is a liability to the ABs as well. Why can't they trust the defence or be more professional having played at the highest level of the game for the best team in rugby union?

  • browner
    9:59 PM 06/04/2013

    Are you serious !

    Name another 'worldwide' sport where it's legal

    Cos a player who becomes a 25mph 'missile' is endangering opposition & themselves.

  • themull
    9:29 PM 06/04/2013

    While it is illegal, I don't see why shoulder charges so long as it is shoulder vs shoulder should be illegal..Of course shoulder charges to the chest and back can be dangerous but shoulder charges to the ball carrier's shoulder are allowed in plenty of physical sports and personally I don't see how it is any more dangerous than your average big tackle..

  • drg
    8:42 PM 06/04/2013

    ...Ali Williams.

  • welshosprey
    7:48 PM 06/04/2013

    Good reffing