Mon 26 Feb 2018 | 01:33
Red card not enough as Higginbotham gets suspended for dangerous tackle

1
Comments

The Queensland Reds will be without the services of loose forward Scott Higginbotham for a few weeks after he was suspended for the dangerous tackle that he was red carded for on Friday. He pleaded guilty but still couldn't avoid a ban.

Higginbotham was sent off early in Friday's Super Rugby clash with the Melbourne Rebels.

The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee accepted a guilty plea after he contravened Law 9.13 - A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously. Dangerous tackling includes, but is not limited to, tackling or attempting to tackle an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders.

Higginbotham has been suspended from all forms of the game for 3 weeks, up to and including Saturday 17 March 2018.

The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee of Nigel Hampton QC (Chairman), Stephen Hardy and John Langford assessed the case. In his finding, Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Nigel Hampton QC ruled the following:

"Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and additional evidence, including a statement from the player and submissions from his legal representative, Mark Martin QC, the Foul Play Review Committee upheld the Red Card under Law 9.13. This was an objectively dangerous tackle.
 
"With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a mid-range entry point of 6 weeks due to the Players direct contact by the Player's shoulder to his opponents head.

"However, taking into account mitigating factors including the Player's good record over a long career, the lack of injury to the victim and his guilty plea at the earliest possible opportunity, the Foul Play Review Committee reduced the suspension to 3 weeks.

"The player is therefore suspended for 3 weeks, up to and including the Saturday 17 March 2018."

Higginbotham's teammate Lukhan Tui faces a disciplinary hearing on Tuesday.

1 Comments

  • drg
    10:16 PM 26/02/2018

    I'm so torn with the thinking, "the lack of injury to the victim", when talking about mitigating factors...

    On one hand, it's great because they're not playing what if's, the guy wasn't injured, maybe the tackle wasn't THAT bad, so knock a bit off the punishment...

    But then on the other hand, had it been Stephen Larkham on.the receiving end (he was Mr Glass Jaw right?), same tackle etc, would he be looking at a greater punishment for a more severe injury even though the force etc is still the same?

    I dunno, maybe I'm just over complicating it - seems like overall he got a ban, can't say it's surprising and probably deserved..